in Re Christopher Joseph McCloskey
This text of in Re Christopher Joseph McCloskey (in Re Christopher Joseph McCloskey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 4, 2008.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-08-00105-CV
IN RE CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On February 14, 2008, relator, Christopher Joseph McCloskey, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Robert J. Kern, presiding judge of the 387th District Court of Fort Bend County, to comply with our mandate issued in 2003, characterize the attorney=s fees at issue as property, not child support, and order the return of garnished funds.
Relator has not established his entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus, and also deny relators= related motion for emergency relief.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 4, 2008.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Boyce.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Christopher Joseph McCloskey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christopher-joseph-mccloskey-texapp-2008.