in Re Christopher Haines
This text of in Re Christopher Haines (in Re Christopher Haines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 13, 2018
No. 04-18-00654-CV
IN RE Christopher HAINES
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
On September 13, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for immediate temporary relief pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. This court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than October 1, 2018. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.
Relator’s request for temporary relief is GRANTED. All proceedings in the underlying case are STAYED pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus.
It is so ORDERED on September 13, 2018.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: _____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CI18574, styled Virginia Castillo v. Christopher Haines and Daniel Haines, pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr. presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Christopher Haines, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christopher-haines-texapp-2018.