in Re Christopher Dupuy
This text of in Re Christopher Dupuy (in Re Christopher Dupuy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed August 20, 2020.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-20-00545-CV
IN RE CHRISTOPHER DUPUY, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-89958
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 4, 2020, relator Christopher Dupuy filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Daryl Moore, presiding judge of the 333rd District Court of Harris County, to: (1) vacate his February 24, 2020 order denying relator’s motion for default judgment and his June 20, 2020 order denying relator’s motion to compel responses to discovery requests, and (2) to grant these motions. We dismiss relator’s petition without prejudice to refiling because relator’s petition and appendix do not show that relator has complied with the requirements of Rule 52.7 and Rule 52.3(k) and (j) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Spain, Hassan, and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Christopher Dupuy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christopher-dupuy-texapp-2020.