in Re Christopher Dupuy
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 24, 2015.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-15-00954-CR
IN RE CHRISTOPHER DUPUY, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 405TH District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15CR1660
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On November 16, 2015, relator Christopher Dupuy filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to declare Section 33.07 of the Texas Penal Code, which makes online impersonation an offense, unconstitutional, order the underlying case dismissed, and discharge relator from custody. 1
The courts of appeals have no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters; their jurisdiction is appellate only. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(d); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ex Parte Denby, 627 S.W.2d 435 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, orig. proceeding). Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge in those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.05 (West 2015); Watson v. State, 96 S.W.3d 497, 499 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2002, pet. ref’d). Therefore, this court is without jurisdiction to consider relator’s petition requesting habeas corpus relief.
Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
1 See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 33.07 (West Supp. 2015). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Christopher Dupuy (in Re Christopher Dupuy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.