In re Christopher A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Christopher A.

66 A.D.3d 1066, 885 N.Y.S.2d 443

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.3d 1066 (In re Christopher A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Christopher A., 66 A.D.3d 1066, 885 N.Y.S.2d 443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Clinton County (Lawliss, J.), entered September 4, 2008, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 3, for an extension of placement.

Respondent was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent and, by order entered December 14, 2007, was placed in the custody of the Clinton County Department of Social Services until August 31, 2008.

* Petitioner’s subsequent application for an extension of placement was granted and respondent remained in placement until January 24, 2009, at which time he was released. Counsel now seeks to be relieved of her assignment upon the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Inasmuch as respondent’s release from placement renders the instant appeal moot (see Matter of Andrew MM., 24 AD3d 1116, 1116 [2005]; Matter of Justin S., 24 AD3d 1304, 1304 [2005]; Matter of Wayne C., 11 AD3d 775, 775 [2004]), we need not address counsel’s application to be relieved of her assignment (see Matter of Senator NN., 21 AD3d 1187, 1188 [2005]; Matter of Natasha F., 15 AD3d 788, 789 [2005]).

Respondent’s appeal from Family Court’s fact-finding and dispositional orders was withdrawn in August 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Clinton County (Lawliss, J.), entered September 4, 2008, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 3, for an extension of placement.

Respondent was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent and, by order entered December 14, 2007, was placed in the custody of the Clinton County Department of Social Services until August 31, 2008.

* Petitioner’s subsequent application for an extension of placement was granted and respondent remained in placement until January 24, 2009, at which time he was released. Counsel now seeks to be relieved of her assignment upon the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Inasmuch as respondent’s release from placement renders the instant appeal moot (see Matter of Andrew MM., 24 AD3d 1116, 1116 [2005]; Matter of Justin S., 24 AD3d 1304, 1304 [2005]; Matter of Wayne C., 11 AD3d 775, 775 [2004]), we need not address counsel’s application to be relieved of her assignment (see Matter of Senator NN., 21 AD3d 1187, 1188 [2005]; Matter of Natasha F., 15 AD3d 788, 789 [2005]).

Respondent’s appeal from Family Court’s fact-finding and dispositional orders was withdrawn in August 2008.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.3d 1066, 885 N.Y.S.2d 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christopher-a-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack