In re Christodoro

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Christodoro

99 A.3d 826, 219 N.J. 619, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 1087

DecidedOctober 9, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.3d 826 (In re Christodoro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Christodoro, 99 A.3d 826, 219 N.J. 619, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 1087 (N.J. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented on the motion of JUSTIN PAUL CHRISTODORO of PARAMUS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2004, and who was transferred to disability inactive status pursuant to Rule 1:20-12 by Order of the Court filed August 29, 2013, seeking to be restored to active status to practice law;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics having interposed no objection to the relief sought;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and JUSTIN PAUL CHRISTODORO is hereby restored to active status, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented on the motion of JUSTIN PAUL CHRISTODORO of PARAMUS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2004, and who was transferred to disability inactive status pursuant to Rule 1:20-12 by Order of the Court filed August 29, 2013, seeking to be restored to active status to practice law;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics having interposed no objection to the relief sought;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and JUSTIN PAUL CHRISTODORO is hereby restored to active status, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.3d 826, 219 N.J. 619, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 1087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christodoro-nj-2014.