In re Christian G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Christian G.

287 A.D.2d 299, 731 N.Y.S.2d 362, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9366

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 11, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 287 A.D.2d 299 (In re Christian G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Christian G., 287 A.D.2d 299, 731 N.Y.S.2d 362, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about January 19, 2001, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would consti[300]*300tute the crime of attempted, assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months with 10 days of community service, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record establishes that the court’s placement of appellant on probation was the least restrictive alternative consistent with his needs in light of his history of poor school attendance and the recommendation made in the probation report (see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947; Matter of Robert R., 207 AD2d 456). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Lerner, Rubin, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about January 19, 2001, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would consti[300]*300tute the crime of attempted, assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months with 10 days of community service, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record establishes that the court’s placement of appellant on probation was the least restrictive alternative consistent with his needs in light of his history of poor school attendance and the recommendation made in the probation report (see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947; Matter of Robert R., 207 AD2d 456). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Lerner, Rubin, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 A.D.2d 299, 731 N.Y.S.2d 362, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christian-g-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack