In re Christenson
Opinion
ORDER
On consideration of the certified order of the California Supreme Court disbarring [822] respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see In re Christenson, No. 08-N-13625 (Cal. Oct. 14, 2009) (en banc), this court’s March 30, 2010, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is
ORDERED that G. Scott Christenson, Esquire, is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C. 2006). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
996 A.2d 821 (In re Christenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.