In re Christ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Christ

243 A.D. 682

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 682 (In re Christ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Christ, 243 A.D. 682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Rule 6 of the local civil service commission is valid as an administrative measure. The position occupied by the incumbent Sehwenk before the promotion fell within the same group as the position to which he was promoted (Part X), while the position of the relators does not. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law, and granting the motion for an order of peremptory mandamus for a competitive promotional examination. (The order denies a mandamus to compel defendants to conduct a competitive examination to fill a vacancy.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Rule 6 of the local civil service commission is valid as an administrative measure. The position occupied by the incumbent Sehwenk before the promotion fell within the same group as the position to which he was promoted (Part X), while the position of the relators does not. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law, and granting the motion for an order of peremptory mandamus for a competitive promotional examination. (The order denies a mandamus to compel defendants to conduct a competitive examination to fill a vacancy.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christ-nyappdiv-1935.