In re Chrisanthis

434 S.E.2d 254, 315 S.C. 382, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 174
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedAugust 17, 1990
StatusPublished

This text of 434 S.E.2d 254 (In re Chrisanthis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Chrisanthis, 434 S.E.2d 254, 315 S.C. 382, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 174 (S.C. 1990).

Opinion

ORDER

Numerous attorney grievances have been filed against respondent. Respondent has tendered a conditional admission and consents to an indefinite suspension.

We accept the conditional admission and indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law. In addition to the requirements of Paragraph 38 of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, respondent must provide proof that he has made restitution to his clients and paid his outstanding debts in any application for readmission. Within fifteen (15) days from the date he receives this order, respondent shall file an affadavit with the Clerk of this Court showing that he has fully com[383]*383plied with the provisions of Paragraph 30 of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 S.E.2d 254, 315 S.C. 382, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chrisanthis-sc-1990.