In re Chris C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Chris C.

248 A.D.2d 329, 670 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3376

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D.2d 329 (In re Chris C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Chris C., 248 A.D.2d 329, 670 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about May 6, 1997, which, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, placed appellant with the Division for Youth for a period of up to 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s fact-finding determination was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Inconsistencies in testimony and other matters relating to credibility were properly presented to the trier of facts and we see no reason to disturb its findings.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about May 6, 1997, which, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, placed appellant with the Division for Youth for a period of up to 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s fact-finding determination was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Inconsistencies in testimony and other matters relating to credibility were properly presented to the trier of facts and we see no reason to disturb its findings.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D.2d 329, 670 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chris-c-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack