In re Chitty
This text of 65 A.D.2d 795 (In re Chitty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to article 77 of the Mental Hygiene Law for the appointment of a conservator of the property of Heyward Chitty, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 3, 1977, as appointed Eric S. Gray as conservator. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. While normally it would be preferable that a member of the family be designated as conservator, in light of the facts present here, there was no abuse of discretion in the court’s appointment of a stranger. Mollen, P. J., Latham, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 A.D.2d 795, 410 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chitty-nyappdiv-1978.