In re Chidinma M. Iwuji
This text of In re Chidinma M. Iwuji (In re Chidinma M. Iwuji) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
No. 19-BG-629
IN RE CHIDINMA M. IWUJI, RESPONDENT.
A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Bar Registration No. 478118)
On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility Ad Hoc Hearing Committee Approving Petition for Negotiated Discipline (DDN 007-18)
(Decided: January 2, 2020)
Before GLICKMAN and FISHER, Associate Judges, and NEBEKER, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM: This decision is non-precedential. Please refer to D.C. Bar R.
XI, § 12.1(d) regarding the appropriate citation of this opinion.
In this disciplinary matter, the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee (the Committee)
recommends approval of a petition for negotiated attorney discipline. See D.C. Bar
R. XI, § 12.1(c). The petition is based on Respondent’s voluntary acknowledgement
that she engaged in commingling of funds and failed to maintain complete records 2
of entrusted funds, in violation of D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct 1.15(a).
Disciplinary Counsel stipulated that it could not prove Respondent engaged in
misappropriation of entrusted funds or that any client or third party was prejudiced
or harmed by Respondent’s handling of entrusted funds and failure to maintain
complete records of those funds. The proposed discipline is a public censure with
conditions.
Having reviewed the Committee’s recommendation in accordance with our
procedures in uncontested disciplinary cases, see D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12.1(d), we agree
that this case is appropriate for negotiated discipline and that the proposed
disposition is not unduly lenient or inconsistent with dispositions imposed for
comparable professional misconduct. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that respondent Chidinma M. Iwuji is hereby publicly censured
and shall comply with the following conditions: (1) Respondent shall take three
hours of pre-approved continuing legal education related to the maintenance of trust
accounts, record keeping, and/or safekeeping client property, and shall certify and
provide proof that she met this requirement to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel
within six months from the date of this opinion; (2) Respondent shall execute a
waiver allowing Dan Mills, Manager of the Practice Management Advisory Service
of the District of Columbia Bar and/or the assigned practice monitor to communicate 3
directly with Disciplinary Counsel regarding her compliance; and (3) Respondent
shall remain in full compliance with the practice monitor’s requirements for a period
of twelve consecutive months, sign an acknowledgment that she is in compliance
with these requirements, and file the acknowledgment with Disciplinary Counsel no
later than two years after the date of this opinion.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Chidinma M. Iwuji, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chidinma-m-iwuji-dc-2020.