In re Chidi N.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Chidi N.

65 A.D.2d 688, 409 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13447

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 65 A.D.2d 688 (In re Chidi N.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Chidi N., 65 A.D.2d 688, 409 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, Bronx County, entered December 9, 1977, which adjudged appellant a juvenile delinquent on the grounds that while under the age of 16 he committed acts constituting the crimes of attempted robbery in the second degree and unlawful possession of a weapon, to the extent appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, to vacate the determination that appellant committed the act constituting unlawful possession of a weapon by a person under 16. As commendably acknowledged by the Corporation Counsel, the knife possessed by appellant—a folding knife with a four-inch blade—does not constitute a dangerous weapon within the meaning of section 265.05 of the Penal Law, (Matter of Ricci S., [689]*68934 NY2d 775) and accordingly that part of the disposition is vacated. Concur —Kupferman, J. P., Evans, Lane, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, Bronx County, entered December 9, 1977, which adjudged appellant a juvenile delinquent on the grounds that while under the age of 16 he committed acts constituting the crimes of attempted robbery in the second degree and unlawful possession of a weapon, to the extent appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, to vacate the determination that appellant committed the act constituting unlawful possession of a weapon by a person under 16. As commendably acknowledged by the Corporation Counsel, the knife possessed by appellant—a folding knife with a four-inch blade—does not constitute a dangerous weapon within the meaning of section 265.05 of the Penal Law, (Matter of Ricci S., [689]*68934 NY2d 775) and accordingly that part of the disposition is vacated. Concur —Kupferman, J. P., Evans, Lane, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.2d 688, 409 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chidi-n-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack