Home/Seventh Circuit/In re Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.

In re Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.

126 F.2d 351, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4134
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 9, 1942
DocketNos. 7561-7569, 7724, 7767-7772, 7740, 7741
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 126 F.2d 351 (In re Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 126 F.2d 351, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4134 (7th Cir. 1942).

Opinion

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

These eighteen appeals1 arise out of the reorganization proceedings of the Chicago [354]*354& North Western Railway Company, instituted pursuant to Section 77 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 205. The Interstate Commerce Commission’s plan of reorganization has been accepted, with one exception, by more than two-thirds of the creditors, of each of the groups, who voted on the reorganization plan, and it has been confirmed by the District Court, after full hearing. We have the benefit of the District Court’s findings and opinion, In re Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., D.C., 35 F.Supp. 230, and an elaborate and informative report by the Examiner of the I. C. C., as well as a complete discussion and ultimate findings by the Commission.2 The appeals are chiefly from the trial court’s orders of approval and confirmation of the plan of reorganization.

The Debtor operates in nine states, over 8,290.533 miles first main track and 13,047.-127 of all tracks.3 A subsidiary of the Debtor, the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company, owns 1,577.171 [355]*355miles of first main track and 2,438.047 miles of all tracks. It is operated and renders reports separately from Debtor but its lines complement those of Debtor.

The Debtor’s obligations, generally, comprehended seven divisional mortgages, two system mortgages, R. F. C., R. C. C., and bank loans, equipment trust obligations, and other miscellaneous indebtedness.

To give a succinct idea of the basic facts of this reorganization and the Debtor’s financial structure, this chart is appended:

[356]*356

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Railroad Yardmasters v. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co.
218 F. Supp. 193 (N.D. Texas, 1963)
Campbell v. American Fabrics Co.
168 F.2d 959 (Second Circuit, 1948)
St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Henwood
157 F.2d 337 (Eighth Circuit, 1946)
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Fleming
157 F.2d 241 (Seventh Circuit, 1946)
Guaranty Trust Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.
53 F. Supp. 672 (E.D. Virginia, 1943)
Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. United States
52 F. Supp. 65 (N.D. Illinois, 1943)
In re Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
50 F. Supp. 835 (N.D. Illinois, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 F.2d 351, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chicago-n-w-ry-co-ca7-1942.