In re Cheryl R.

235 A.D.2d 365, 652 N.Y.S.2d 976, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 717

This text of 235 A.D.2d 365 (In re Cheryl R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cheryl R., 235 A.D.2d 365, 652 N.Y.S.2d 976, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.), entered on or about October 17, 1995, adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a factfinding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fifth degrees, and placing her on probation for a period of 2 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The expense report in question did not pertain to the subject matter of the witness’s testimony, as it related to the charges [366]*366against appellant, and thus did not constitute Rosario material (see, People v Bailey, 200 AD2d 677, lv denied 83 NY2d 849). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bailey
200 A.D.2d 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D.2d 365, 652 N.Y.S.2d 976, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cheryl-r-nyappdiv-1997.