In re Cherry
201 A.D. 856
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1922·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied, without costs; as the printed papers on appeal consist largely [857] of irrelevant matter, disbursement for printing the record is disallowed, but disbursement for printing points is allowed. The ordinances of the village of Larehmont
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Cherry, 201 A.D. 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).
201 A.D. 856 (In re Cherry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gramatan Hills Manor, Inc. v. Manganiello
30 Misc. 2d 117 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
State ex rel. Stephens v. Kees
110 So. 2d 172 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1959)
Haussman v. Oatley
285 A.D. 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
Von der Heide v. Zoning Board of Appeals
282 A.D. 1076 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
White Plains Housing Authority v. Zoning Board of Appeals
278 A.D. 125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Maxwell v. Klaess
192 Misc. 939 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
State Ex Rel. Shaver v. Mayor of Coushatta
196 So. 388 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1940)
Gold v. Bldg. Com. of Warren Boro.
5 A.2d 367 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Nagaven Realties, Inc. v. Banzhaf
149 Misc. 361 (New York Supreme Court, 1933)
Huetsch v. Grove
16 Pa. D. & C. 86 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1930)
State Ex Rel. Manhein v. Harrison
114 So. 159 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
Willerup v. Village of Hempstead
120 Misc. 485 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)