In re Chenoweth

22 C.M.A. 650
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedNovember 6, 1972
DocketNo. 72-39
StatusPublished

This text of 22 C.M.A. 650 (In re Chenoweth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Chenoweth, 22 C.M.A. 650 (cma 1972).

Opinion

On consideration of the "Petition for Habeas Corpus” filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that petitioner was placed in confinement pending trial upon charges alleging, inter alia, willful destruction of military property of the United States, to wit, damage to the reduction gears aboard the USS Ranger, in violation of Article 108, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §908, and it further appearing that the order directing such confinement may not be described as an abuse of discretion, it is, by the Court, this 6th day of November 1972,

ORDERED that said Petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed. Horner v. Resor, 19 USCMA 285, 41 CMR 285 (1970); Hallinan v. Lamont, 18 USCMA 652 (1968).

Judge Darden would dismiss the Petition because in his view the relief it seeks would not be in aid of this Court’s jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horner v. Resor
19 C.M.A. 285 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 C.M.A. 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chenoweth-cma-1972.