In re Chatburn

604 A.2d 89, 127 N.J. 248, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1061
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 31, 1992
StatusPublished

This text of 604 A.2d 89 (In re Chatburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Chatburn, 604 A.2d 89, 127 N.J. 248, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1061 (N.J. 1992).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court, recommending that STEPHEN P. CHATBURN of MOUNT LAUREL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, be suspended for a period of three months and on reinstatement be required to practice under the supervision of a proctor for a period of one year;

And the Court having considered the briefs and arguments of counsel, and having determined that the appropriate measure of discipline of respondent is a public reprimand, with conditions on respondent’s practice;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report of the Disciplinary Review Board is hereby adopted and respondent is publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a proctor approved by the Office of Attorney [249]*249Ethics in accordance with Administrative Guideline No,. 28 for.a period of one year; and it is further , ,.

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
604 A.2d 89, 127 N.J. 248, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chatburn-nj-1992.