In Re Chastity, (Sep. 13, 1999)

Connecticut Superior Court

In Re Chastity, (Sep. 13, 1999)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 12354

DecidedSeptember 13, 1999

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 12354 (In Re Chastity, (Sep. 13, 1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Chastity, (Sep. 13, 1999), 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 12354 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Chastity was adjudged, neglected and committed (custody and guardianship) to the Department of Children and Families (DCF) on February 5, 1998. Continuing efforts to reunify father and child have been found not appropriate. On September 2, 1999, sole custody was returned to the mother without objection by the father.

The father objected to a DCF further request that sole guardianship be vested in the mother. Conn. Gen. Stat. §45a-606. The father was concerned that his access to information about his daughter would be denied to him. Compare § 46b-56 (e). The court grants the request.

Any shift of guardianship based on a Superior Court juvenile matters adjudication remains within the exclusive jurisdiction of this court. In re Juvenile Appeal (85-BC), 195 Conn. 344 (1985). A transfer of guardianship, however, is far from termination of parental rights. While the father as non guardian may have no right to care and control of his daughter or to make "major decisions affecting the child's welfare, including consent CT Page 12355 determinations regarding marriage, enlistment in the armed forces and major medical, psychoactive or surgical treatment," §45a-604 (5), his removal does not terminate his right to see his daughter and to be involved in her life. He may be entitled to court ordered visitation or reinstatement as a guardian. In reHelen B., 50 Conn. app. 818, 826 (1998). Because of the current relationship of the parents and child, the court expects that the mother will provide to the father basic information on their daughter's academic and health status, as well as to continue the present father daughter contact.

The court need not resolve hypothetical issues.

Accordingly, the father's guardianship right in his daughter is removed so the sole guardian of the child is the mother.

Samuel S. Goldstein Judge Trial Referee

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Chastity was adjudged, neglected and committed (custody and guardianship) to the Department of Children and Families (DCF) on February 5, 1998. Continuing efforts to reunify father and child have been found not appropriate. On September 2, 1999, sole custody was returned to the mother without objection by the father.

The father objected to a DCF further request that sole guardianship be vested in the mother. Conn. Gen. Stat. §45a-606. The father was concerned that his access to information about his daughter would be denied to him. Compare § 46b-56 (e). The court grants the request.

Any shift of guardianship based on a Superior Court juvenile matters adjudication remains within the exclusive jurisdiction of this court. In re Juvenile Appeal (85-BC), 195 Conn. 344 (1985). A transfer of guardianship, however, is far from termination of parental rights. While the father as non guardian may have no right to care and control of his daughter or to make "major decisions affecting the child's welfare, including consent CT Page 12355 determinations regarding marriage, enlistment in the armed forces and major medical, psychoactive or surgical treatment," §45a-604 (5), his removal does not terminate his right to see his daughter and to be involved in her life. He may be entitled to court ordered visitation or reinstatement as a guardian. In reHelen B., 50 Conn. app. 818, 826 (1998). Because of the current relationship of the parents and child, the court expects that the mother will provide to the father basic information on their daughter's academic and health status, as well as to continue the present father daughter contact.

The court need not resolve hypothetical issues.

Accordingly, the father's guardianship right in his daughter is removed so the sole guardian of the child is the mother.

Samuel S. Goldstein Judge Trial Referee

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 12354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chastity-sep-13-1999-connsuperct-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack