In Re Chase & Sanborn Corp.
This text of 54 B.R. 43 (In Re Chase & Sanborn Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re CHASE & SANBORN CORP. f/k/a General Coffee Corp. et al., Debtor(s).
Paul C. NORDBERG, as Trustee etc., Plaintiff,
v.
BANK OF CREDIT AND COMMERCE INTERNATIONAL, Defendant.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
*44 Roberta A. Colton, Tampa, Fla., for defendant.
John H. Genovese, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff.
ORDER DENYING JURY TRIAL
THOMAS C. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judge.
The defendant's demand for jury trial in this adversary proceeding was heard on August 5. The demand for a jury trial is denied.
The action is to avoid a preference under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b). No right to a jury existed under the Common Law for such an action, which is a statutory remedy bottomed on principles of equity. Katchen v. Landy, 382 U.S. 323, 86 S.Ct. 467, 15 L.Ed.2d 391 (1966); Sibley v. Fulton Dekalb Collection Service, 677 F.2d 830 (11th Cir.1982); Country Junction, Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co. (In re Country Junction, Inc.), 41 B.R. 425 (W.D.Tex.1984); Lerblance v. Rodgers (In re Rodgers & Sons, Inc.), 48 B.R. 683 (Bankr.E.D.Okla.1985); Pennels v. Barnes (In re Best Pack Seafood, Inc.), 45 B.R. 194 (Bankr.D.Me.1984). I see no reason to exercise this court's discretion to provide a jury in this instance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 B.R. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chase-sanborn-corp-flsb-1985.