In re: Chase Hunter v.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2015·No. 15-1876·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1876

In re: CHASE CARMEN HUNTER

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (No. 1:15-cv-00903-CMH-TCB)

Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chase Carmen Hunter, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Chase Carmen Hunter petitions for a writ of mandamus,

alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on

her motion for injunctive relief. She seeks an order from this

court directing the district court to act. We conclude the

present record does not reveal undue delay in the district

court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We also deny as moot

Hunter’s motion to expedite the decision. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Chase Hunter v., (4th Cir. 2015).

In re: Chase Hunter v. (In re: Chase Hunter v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.