in Re Charles L. Grable
Opinion
Opinion issued April 22, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
In 1998, relator pleaded guilty to the felony offense of indecency with a child. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.11 (West 2011). The trial court deferred an adjudication of guilt and placed relator on probation for five years. Later that year, relator’s guilt was adjudicated and punishment was assessed at confinement for sixteen years in the Institution Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. See Grable v. State, No. 14-02-00335-CR, 2002 WL 1000398, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 16, 2002, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction because notice of appeal was untimely).
A writ of habeas corpus is the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2013); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Only the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction habeas corpus proceedings. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07; see also Bd. of Pardons & Paroles, 910 S.W.2d at 483. The Court has no authority to issue a writ of mandamus on matters seeking post-conviction relief in felony convictions in which the judgment is final. See In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Charles L. Grable (in Re Charles L. Grable) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.