In Re: Charles J. Jayroe v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Denied and Opinion Filed November 14, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-01306-CV
IN RE CHARLES J. JAYROE, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 219-55128-2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Smith
Relator, who is proceeding pro se, filed a November 8, 2024 petition for writ
of mandamus asking this Court to compel the trial court to promptly review all pending motions, conduct an expedited hearing on a motion for contempt, dismiss or strike an Order of Enforcement by Contempt and Suspension of Sentence against relator, ensure that all motions and requests are promptly presented to the judge for immediate review, expand the scope of relator’s counsel’s representation, and modify relator’s visitation with his child.
Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(g), (h), (j), (k)(1)(A); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a).
Because relator’s petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for consideration of mandamus relief, we deny the petition.
Additionally, relator’s separately filed record discloses unredacted sensitive data, including a minor’s full name, birthdate, and address, in violation of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9. Accordingly, we strike relator’s separately filed record.
241306f.p05 /Craig Smith// CRAIG SMITH
JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re: Charles J. Jayroe v. the State of Texas (In Re: Charles J. Jayroe v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.