In Re: Charles J. Jayroe v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 14, 2024·No. 05-24-01306-CV·Published

Opinion

Denied and Opinion Filed November 14, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-01306-CV

IN RE CHARLES J. JAYROE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-55128-2013

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Smith

Relator, who is proceeding pro se, filed a November 8, 2024 petition for writ

of mandamus asking this Court to compel the trial court to promptly review all pending motions, conduct an expedited hearing on a motion for contempt, dismiss or strike an Order of Enforcement by Contempt and Suspension of Sentence against relator, ensure that all motions and requests are promptly presented to the judge for immediate review, expand the scope of relator’s counsel’s representation, and modify relator’s visitation with his child.

Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(g), (h), (j), (k)(1)(A); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a).

Because relator’s petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for consideration of mandamus relief, we deny the petition.

Additionally, relator’s separately filed record discloses unredacted sensitive data, including a minor’s full name, birthdate, and address, in violation of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9. Accordingly, we strike relator’s separately filed record.

241306f.p05 /Craig Smith// CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Charles J. Jayroe v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

In Re: Charles J. Jayroe v. the State of Texas (In Re: Charles J. Jayroe v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.