in Re Charles Edward Davis
This text of in Re Charles Edward Davis (in Re Charles Edward Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 28, 2011.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-11-00581-CR
In Re CHARLES EDWARD DAVIS, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
230th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 898389
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On July 5, 2011, relator Charles Edward Davis filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator seeks to challenge a final felony conviction and punishment.
While the courts of appeals have mandamus jurisdiction in criminal matters, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to final post-conviction felony proceedings. Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 1991). This court has no authority to issue a writ of mandamus to compel a district court judge to rule on matters seeking post-conviction relief from final felony convictions. See In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex .App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding).
Because relator is seeking post-conviction relief, we do not have jurisdiction over this proceeding. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Jamison, and McCally.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Charles Edward Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-charles-edward-davis-texapp-2011.