Home/Federal Circuit/In Re Charles D. Roselin

In Re Charles D. Roselin

48 F.3d 1235, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2578, 1995 WL 57223
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided February 2, 1995·No. 94-1522·Published

Opinion

48 F.3d 1235
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

In re Charles D. ROSELIN.

No. 94-1522.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 2, 1995.

PTO

APPEAL REINSTATED.

ORDER

Appellant having filed the required brief, it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the notice of appeal is REINSTATED.

Respondent should compute the due date for filing its brief from the date of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Charles D. Roselin, 48 F.3d 1235, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2578, 1995 WL 57223 (Fed. Cir. 1995).

48 F.3d 1235 (In Re Charles D. Roselin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.