in Re Charles Boothe
This text of in Re Charles Boothe (in Re Charles Boothe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-09-00448-CV
In re Charles Boothe
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
Charles Boothe alleged in his petition for writ of mandamus that the district attorney was refusing to do her duty to see that justice is done and to not suppress exculpatory evidence, and that the trial court was failing to perform duties related to hearing and deciding writs of habeas corpus. According to the State's response, after Boothe filed this petition, he pleaded guilty, was sentenced to 90 days in jail, was credited for 90 days served in jail, and released from custody. We dismiss this petition for writ of mandamus as moot.
G. Alan Waldrop, Justice
Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson
Filed: September 30, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Charles Boothe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-charles-boothe-texapp-2009.