in Re: Charles Anthony Allen, Sr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 16, 2018
Docket05-18-00120-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Charles Anthony Allen, Sr. (in Re: Charles Anthony Allen, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Charles Anthony Allen, Sr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Dismissed w.o.j. and Opinion Filed February 16, 2018

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00120-CV

IN RE CHARLES ANTHONY ALLEN, SR., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F00-51709-HJU

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Lang Relator’s article 11.07 petition for writ of habeas corpus is pending in the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals. In a September 20, 2017 order, the court of criminal appeals ordered the trial

court to take certain actions, make certain findings, and file a supplemental transcript and

supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law with 120 days of the date of the order. In

this original proceeding, relator contends the trial court has not complied with the order and seeks

a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to comply.

The Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction to grant relief in a post-conviction

habeas corpus proceeding where there is a final felony conviction. Padieu v. Court of Appeals of

Texas, Fifth District, 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013); Ex parte Alexander, 685

S.W.2d 57, 60 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985); TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 § 5 (West Supp.

2013). An intermediate appellate court has no jurisdiction to rule on matters pertaining to a

pending Article 11.07 application. Padieu, 392 S.W.3d at 117–18. The September 20, 2017 order pertains to relator’s pending Article 11.07 application. We, therefore, have no jurisdiction to

enforce that order. Accordingly, we dismiss this proceeding for want of jurisdiction.

/Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE 180120F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Alexander
685 S.W.2d 57 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Padieu, Philippe, Relator v. Court of Appeals of Texas, 5th District
392 S.W.3d 115 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Charles Anthony Allen, Sr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-charles-anthony-allen-sr-texapp-2018.