in Re Charles and Kimberly Lukancich
This text of in Re Charles and Kimberly Lukancich (in Re Charles and Kimberly Lukancich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-09-00347-CV
IN RE Charles and Kimberly LUKANCICH
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 1, 2009
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On June 11, 2009, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary
relief. The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and real party in interest’s
response and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the
petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for temporary relief are DENIED. See TEX . R. APP .
P. 52.8(a).
… This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 06-1750-CV, styled In the Interest of J.V., pending in the 25th 1
Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Dwight E. Peschel presiding. However, the order complained of was signed by the Honorable Karin Bonicoro, Associate Judge of the Child Protection Court of Central Texas Court #4, 3rd Administrative Judicial Region.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Charles and Kimberly Lukancich, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-charles-and-kimberly-lukancich-texapp-2009.