In re Chappell
113 F. 545, 1901 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21
Opinion
The foregoing report of the referee is approved and adopted as the opinion of the court, and a decree of distribution may be entered in accordance therewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Chappell, 113 F. 545, 1901 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21 (E.D. Va. 1901).
113 F. 545 (In re Chappell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Prout's Inc. v. McIntyre
48 A.2d 487 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1946)
In re Clinton Wine & Liquor, Inc.
40 F. Supp. 106 (D. New Jersey, 1941)
Travis v. Bixler Vapor Dry Cleaning Co.
66 P.2d 1263 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
Pue v. Wheeler
255 P. 1043 (Montana Supreme Court, 1927)
Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke v. Bear
265 U.S. 365 (Supreme Court, 1924)
In re Ann Arbor Mach. Co.
278 F. 749 (E.D. Michigan, 1922)
In re K. G. Whitfield & Bro.
290 F. 596 (W.D. Tennessee, 1921)
DeLaval Separator Co. v. Jones
102 A. 968 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1918)
Simpson v. Western Hardware & Metal Co.
167 P. 113 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)
McNeel v. Folk
83 S.E. 192 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1914)
Cook v. Robinson
194 F. 785 (Ninth Circuit, 1912)
Jackson v. Valley Tie & Lumber Co.
62 S.E. 964 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1908)