In re Chapman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Chapman

172 A.3d 395

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 2, 2017

DocketNo. 17-BS-608; Board Docket No. 17-PD-016; DDN: 267-16

StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.3d 395 (In re Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Chapman, 172 A.3d 395 (D.C. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Upon, consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility, pursuant to D.C.. Bar R. XI, § 13(c), to suspend respondent indefinitely based on disability, and the Board’s motion to file under seal, and it appearing that neither respondent nor Disciplinary Counsel haying interposed an objection thereto, it .is hereby

ORDERED that the Board’s motion- to file under seal is granted; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately. Respondent’s reinstatement, to the District of Columbia Bar shall be in accordance with the provisions of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g); and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is drawn to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 14 and 16, relating to suspended attorneys; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) with the court and the Board and shall serve a copy of the affidavit on Disciplinary Counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI