In Re Channel One Communications, Inc.

117 B.R. 493, 5 Bankr. Rep (St. Louis B.A.) 4968, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1734, 1990 WL 118141
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedAugust 9, 1990
Docket19-40539
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 117 B.R. 493 (In Re Channel One Communications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Channel One Communications, Inc., 117 B.R. 493, 5 Bankr. Rep (St. Louis B.A.) 4968, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1734, 1990 WL 118141 (Mo. 1990).

Opinion

ORDER APPROVING DEBTOR’S MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN RIVER CITY TELEVISION PARTNERS, L.P. AND CHANNEL ONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

JAMES J. BARTA, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter coming before the Court upon the Motion for Approval of Asset Purchase Agreement by and between River City Television Partners, L.P. and Channel One Communications, Inc. (the “Sale Motion”). This Court having previously scheduled a hearing on the Sale Motion for August 9, 1990 at 10:00 a.m. Present at the hearing on the Sale Motion were Counsel for Channel One Communications, Inc. (“Debtor”), River City Television Partners, L.P. (“River City”), Landmark Bank (“Bank”), the Official Unsecured Creditors Committee (“Committee”), and for certain other interested parties. After consideration of the testimony and other evidence adduced at the hearing and upon consideration of the record as a whole,

THE COURT HEREBY FINDS THAT:

A. Debtor is a corporation organized under and existing by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware. Debtor owns and operates KSTZ, an FM radio station operating in the St. Louis metropolitan area.

B. On April 12, 1990, Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. On May 3, 1990, this Court entered a Stipulated Order Authorizing Interim Secured and Priority Financing (the “Borrowing Order”). Under Paragraph 2(s) of the Borrowing Order, a process was established to solicit bids for the purchase of substantially all of Debtor’s assets.

C. In connection with the process for the sale of substantially all of Debtor’s assets set forth in the Borrowing Order, on May 24, 1990, Debtor filed an Application to Approve Employment of Media Brokers whereby Debtor sought to engage the nonexclusive services of at least three media brokers to assist in the sale of substantially all its assets.

D. Debtor solicited prospective purchasers both directly and through the retained media brokers. Debtor, which had also attempted to sell the radio station for some months prior to the bankruptcy filing, contacted or was contacted by prospective purchasers. Three parties submitted bids for the purchase of substantially all of Debt- *495 or’s assets in conformity with the time deadline set forth in Paragraphs 2(s) of the Borrowing Order.

E. After conducting discussions with each of the three interested bidders, Debtor determined that River City was the bidder most likely to be able to close on the prospective purchase and that its bid offered the highest and best consideration available to bankruptcy estate. Debtor and River City negotiated the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), which is attached as Exhibit A to the Sale Motion. Under the terms of the Sale Agreement, River City is to pay to Debtor Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000) in cash at closing (inclusive of a One Hundred Thousand Dollar ($100,000) earnest money deposit and subject to certain adjustments as set forth in the Purchase Agreement). In addition, River City is to pay to Debtor Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) in cash at closing in exchange for Debtor’s and certain of its principals agreeing to certain non-competition provisions. River City shall also deliver to Debtor a Promissory Note in the original amount of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), at closing, such Note bearing interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum, payable semi-annually, with interest only payable in the first two years, and with principal and interest installments payable in each of years three, four, and five, and with a lump sum payment of all principal and interest then due on the fifth anniversary of the closing. Moreover, under the Purchase Agreement, River City will assume Debtor’s obligations under certain contracts pertaining to the purchased assets as more particularly set forth in the Purchase Agreement (the “Assumed Contracts”).

F. On July 12, 1990, Debtor mailed a Notice and Information Statement Pertaining to Sale of Substantially All of Debtor’s Assets to all creditors and parties in interest listed on the Court’s matrix and to all other parties Debtor had identified as being potentially interested in purchasing the radio station (“Notice and Information Statement”). The Notice and Information Statement expressly stated that a hearing on the Sale Motion was to occur on August 9,1990 and that any objections to the relief sought had to be lodged with the Bankruptcy Court on or before August 6, 1990. The Notice and Information Statement summarized the salient terms of the Purchase Agreement and stated that, upon closing of the sale, Debtor intended to propose a plan of liquidation whereby the sale proceeds (after payment of secured creditors) would be distributed to creditors in accordance with the priority of the claims asserted against Debtor.

G. No objections to the Sale Motion were filed with the Court prior to the August 6, 1990 deadline, and no objections were presented at this hearing.

H. River City is a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. The shareholders and principals of the Debtor do not have a partnership or equity interest in River City whatsoever and the general and limited partners of River City hold no equity interests in the Debtor.

I. Although sales have increased since the commencement of this case, Debtor has had to borrow funds from the Bank to finance its operations. Since the filing, Debtor’s expenses have exceeded its cash revenues by more than $152,000.

J. In the event that the Bank terminates its post-petition funding of Debtor’s operations, Debtor would be forced to cease operations, thus jeopardizing its FCC broadcast license and diminishing the value of its assets.

K. The Purchase Agreement was negotiated at arm’s length and both Debtor and River City have acted in good faith.

L. Any of the foregoing findings of fact deemed to be conclusions of law are hereby incorporated as conclusions of law, and any of the following conclusions of law deemed to be findings of fact are hereby incorporated as findings of fact.

THE COURT CONCLUDES THAT:

1. This matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(M).

*496 2. A sale of substantially all of the Debtor’s assets other than in the ordinary course of business and without the structure of a Chapter 11 Disclosure Statement and Plan is not prohibited by the Bankruptcy Code. In re Lionel Corp., 722 F.2d 1063 (2nd Cir.1983); In re Abbotts Dairies of Pennsylvania, Inc., 788 F.2d 143 (3rd Cir.1986). However, in the absence of the protection and finality offered by a disclosure statement and plan, such a transaction pursuant to Section 363(b) requires specific authorization by the Court. The sale must be closely scrutinized, and the proponent bears a heightened burden of proving the elements necessary for authorization. In re Industrial Valley Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Supplies, Inc., 77 B.R. 15, 17 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Encore Healthcare Associates
312 B.R. 52 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2004)
In Re Medical Software Solutions
286 B.R. 431 (D. Utah, 2002)
In Re the Landing
156 B.R. 246 (E.D. Missouri, 1993)
In Re Equity Management Systems
149 B.R. 120 (S.D. Iowa, 1993)
In Re Plabell Rubber Products, Inc.
149 B.R. 475 (N.D. Ohio, 1992)
In Re Wilde Horse Enterprises, Inc.
136 B.R. 830 (C.D. California, 1991)
In re Channel One Communications, Inc.
125 B.R. 234 (E.D. Missouri, 1991)
In Re George Walsh Chevrolet, Inc.
118 B.R. 99 (E.D. Missouri, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 B.R. 493, 5 Bankr. Rep (St. Louis B.A.) 4968, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1734, 1990 WL 118141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-channel-one-communications-inc-moeb-1990.