In re Chanel Anjelique R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Chanel Anjelique R.

191 A.D.2d 1002, 595 N.Y.S.2d 344

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 1002 (In re Chanel Anjelique R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Chanel Anjelique R., 191 A.D.2d 1002, 595 N.Y.S.2d 344 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Oneida County Surrogate’s Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The Surrogate erred by summarily dismissing petitioner’s application to set aside a private placement order of adoption without conducting an evidentiary hearing (see, Domestic Relations Law § 115-b [7]; cf., Matter of Rickey AA., 146 AD2d 433, affd 75 NY2d 885). Upon remittitur, we direct the court to appoint a guardian ad litem for the child (see, SCPA 403-a [1]). (Appeal from Order of Oneida County Surrogate’s Court, Ringrose, S. — Adoption.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Oneida County Surrogate’s Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The Surrogate erred by summarily dismissing petitioner’s application to set aside a private placement order of adoption without conducting an evidentiary hearing (see, Domestic Relations Law § 115-b [7]; cf., Matter of Rickey AA., 146 AD2d 433, affd 75 NY2d 885). Upon remittitur, we direct the court to appoint a guardian ad litem for the child (see, SCPA 403-a [1]). (Appeal from Order of Oneida County Surrogate’s Court, Ringrose, S. — Adoption.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 1002, 595 N.Y.S.2d 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chanel-anjelique-r-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack