In re Chandler D.
This text of 16 A.D.3d 684 (In re Chandler D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In two related neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the Nassau County Department of Social Services appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Pessala, J.), dated August 10, 2004, which granted the motion of the respondent mother, Carole D., to dismiss the petitions in both proceedings insofar as asserted against her.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion is denied, and the petitions in both proceedings are reinstated insofar as asserted against Carole D.
The Family Court erred in dismissing the neglect petitions insofar as asserted against the respondent Carole D. without holding a fact-finding hearing (see Matter of Jasmine S. [Mirayah S.], 1 AD3d 257 [2003]; Matter of Jonathan M., 306 [685]*685AD2d 413 [2003]). “Only at the conclusion of a fact-finding hearing can the Family Court dismiss the petitions upon determining that its aid is not required on the record before it and, in that event, it must state on the record the ground(s) for dismissal (see Family Ct Act § 1051 [c])” (Matter of Jonathan M., supra at 414). Accordingly, Carole D.’s motion to dismiss the petitions insofar as asserted against her should have been denied. Ritter, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 A.D.3d 684, 791 N.Y.S.2d 451, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chandler-d-nyappdiv-2005.