In re Chambers
This text of 224 A.D. 863 (In re Chambers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to the Special Term to take proof upon the issues presented. We are of opinion that in this case, in determining and enforcing an attorney’s lien, such issues were presented that the demands of justice require a hearing either in open court or before a referee. (Matter of Speranza, 186 N. Y. 280; Matter of King, 168 id. 53, 58.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 A.D. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chambers-nyappdiv-1928.