In re Chambers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Chambers

224 A.D. 863

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1928·Published

Opinion

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to the Special Term to take proof upon the issues presented. We are of opinion that in this case, in determining and enforcing an attorney’s lien, such issues were presented that the demands of justice require a hearing either in open court or before a referee. (Matter of Speranza, 186 N. Y. 280; Matter of King, 168 id. 53, 58.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to the Special Term to take proof upon the issues presented. We are of opinion that in this case, in determining and enforcing an attorney’s lien, such issues were presented that the demands of justice require a hearing either in open court or before a referee. (Matter of Speranza, 186 N. Y. 280; Matter of King, 168 id. 53, 58.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

In re Chambers, 224 A.D. 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

224 A.D. 863 (In re Chambers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related