In re Chad Y.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Chad Y.

118 A.D.3d 814, 987 N.Y.S.2d 228

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 118 A.D.3d 814 (In re Chad Y.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Chad Y., 118 A.D.3d 814, 987 N.Y.S.2d 228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother’s parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (O’Shea, J.), dated June 10, 2013, as, after a hearing, determined that his consent to the adoption of the subject child was not required pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 111 (1) (d).

[815]*815Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court’s determination that the father’s consent to the adoption of the subject child was not required was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Domestic Relations Law § 111 [1] [d]; Matter of Sharissa G., 51 AD3d 1019, 1020 [2008]; Matter of Felix M., 9 AD3d 432, 433 [2004]; Matter of Kianna C., 292 AD2d 380, 381 [2002]).

Rivera, J.E, Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother’s parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (O’Shea, J.), dated June 10, 2013, as, after a hearing, determined that his consent to the adoption of the subject child was not required pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 111 (1) (d).

[815]*815Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court’s determination that the father’s consent to the adoption of the subject child was not required was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Domestic Relations Law § 111 [1] [d]; Matter of Sharissa G., 51 AD3d 1019, 1020 [2008]; Matter of Felix M., 9 AD3d 432, 433 [2004]; Matter of Kianna C., 292 AD2d 380, 381 [2002]).

Rivera, J.E, Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 A.D.3d 814, 987 N.Y.S.2d 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chad-y-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack