In re Chacova G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Chacova G.

22 A.D.3d 355, 802 N.Y.S.2d 151

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.3d 355 (In re Chacova G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Chacova G., 22 A.D.3d 355, 802 N.Y.S.2d 151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J), entered on or about August 25, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted robbery in the first and second degrees, attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, assault in the third degree, menacing in the second degree, unlawful possession of weapons by a person under 16, and possession of knives or instruments, and placed her in the custody of the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Appellant’s accessorial liability could be readily inferred from her actions, which included, among other things, demanding that the victim surrender his property (see e.g. Matter of Juan J., 81 NY2d 739 [1992]; People v Allah, 71 NY2d 830 [1988]). We have considered and rejected appellant’s remaining claims. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J), entered on or about August 25, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted robbery in the first and second degrees, attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, assault in the third degree, menacing in the second degree, unlawful possession of weapons by a person under 16, and possession of knives or instruments, and placed her in the custody of the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Appellant’s accessorial liability could be readily inferred from her actions, which included, among other things, demanding that the victim surrender his property (see e.g. Matter of Juan J., 81 NY2d 739 [1992]; People v Allah, 71 NY2d 830 [1988]). We have considered and rejected appellant’s remaining claims. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.3d 355, 802 N.Y.S.2d 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chacova-g-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack