In re C.G.F.
This text of In re C.G.F. (In re C.G.F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
2022-NCSC-124
No. 312A21
Filed 16 December 2022 IN THE MATTER OF C.G.F.
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from an unpublished decision of a
divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 278 N.C. App. 604, 2021-NCCOA-364,
affirming an involuntary commitment order entered on 14 February 2020 by Judge
Pat Evans in District Court, Durham County. Heard in the Supreme Court 20
September 2022.
Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, and South A. Moore, General Counsel Fellow for the State-appellee.
Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Wyatt Orsbon, Assistant Appellate Defender, for respondent-appellant.
Disability Rights North Carolina, by Lisa Grafstein, Holly Stiles, and Elizabeth Myerholtz, for Disability Rights North Carolina, National Association of Social Workers, Promise Resource Network, and Peer Voice North Carolina, amici curiae.
PER CURIAM.
¶1 For the reasons stated in In re J.R., 2022-NCSC-127, the decision of the Court
of Appeals is affirmed.
AFFIRMED. IN RE C.G.F
Opinion of the Court
Justices HUDSON, MORGAN, and EARLS dissent for the reasons stated in
Justice Earls’ dissenting opinion in In re J.R., 2022-NCSC-127.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re C.G.F., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cgf-nc-2022.