in Re Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Gulf Coast Claims Service and John Andres
This text of in Re Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Gulf Coast Claims Service and John Andres (in Re Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Gulf Coast Claims Service and John Andres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued April 10, 2014.
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00297-CV ——————————— IN RE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON, GULF COAST CLAIMS SERVICE, AND JOHN ANDRES, Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Gulf Coast Claims
Service, and John Andres, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus, contending
that respondent, the Honorable Jaclanel Moore McFarland, abused her discretion in
denying relators’ motion for continuance.1
1 The underlying case is Charles Zaid v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Gulf Coast Claims Service, and John Andres, cause no. 2011-02175, in the 133rd We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.
District Court of Harris County, the Honorable Jaclanel Moore McFarland, presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Gulf Coast Claims Service and John Andres, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-certain-underwriters-at-lloyds-london-gulf-c-texapp-2014.