In re Central Railroad

Third Circuit

In re Central Railroad

392 F.2d 589

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1968

DocketNo. 17012

StatusPublished

This text of 392 F.2d 589 (In re Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Central Railroad, 392 F.2d 589 (3d Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The arguments of the appellant, The New York Central Railroad Company, and the intervenors, Southern Railway Company, et al., have been considered. They have been amply met by the sound reasoning of Chief Judge Augelli of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in his Memorandum and Order of September 21, 1967, as amended September 26, 1967, 273 F.Supp. 282, which will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The arguments of the appellant, The New York Central Railroad Company, and the intervenors, Southern Railway Company, et al., have been considered. They have been amply met by the sound reasoning of Chief Judge Augelli of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in his Memorandum and Order of September 21, 1967, as amended September 26, 1967, 273 F.Supp. 282, which will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

392 F.2d 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-central-railroad-ca3-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack