In re Central Railroad

Third Circuit

In re Central Railroad

392 F.2d 589

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 22, 1968·No. No. 17012·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The arguments of the appellant, The New York Central Railroad Company, and the intervenors, Southern Railway Company, et al., have been considered. They have been amply met by the sound reasoning of Chief Judge Augelli of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in his Memorandum and Order of September 21, 1967, as amended September 26, 1967, 273 F.Supp. 282, which will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The arguments of the appellant, The New York Central Railroad Company, and the intervenors, Southern Railway Company, et al., have been considered. They have been amply met by the sound reasoning of Chief Judge Augelli of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in his Memorandum and Order of September 21, 1967, as amended September 26, 1967, 273 F.Supp. 282, which will be affirmed.

In re Central Railroad, 392 F.2d 589 (3d Cir. 1968).

Pincite

392 F.2d 589 (In re Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related