in Re Celia Rear
Opinion
Opinion issued November 10, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
the parent-child relationship.1 Relator also filed a motion for emergency stay of jury trial on November 3, 2015, seeking a stay of the pretrial conference set for November 6, 2015, and the jury trial set for November 16, 2015, pending resolution of her petition. On November 3, 2015, the real party in interest, Jason Edward Minton, filed a second amended response to relator’s motion.
The Court, having examined and considered the petition and appendix, motion, and response, is of the opinion that relator has not established herself entitled to the mandamus relief sought. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a), (d). We dismiss the motion for emergency relief as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Higley, Huddle, and Lloyd.
1 The underlying case is In the Interest of S.A.M., a Child, Cause No. 2005-04747, pending in the 311th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Alicia Franklin York presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Celia Rear (in Re Celia Rear) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.