In Re Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.

162 S.W.3d 769, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 2812, 2005 WL 850429

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 12, 2005

Docket08-05-00099-CV

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 162 S.W.3d 769 (In Re Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Celadon Trucking Services, Inc., 162 S.W.3d 769, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 2812, 2005 WL 850429 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice.

Relators, Celadon Trucking Services, Inc., Jesus Mesta, and Dolores Rosales, ask this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 120th District Court of El Paso County. Mandamus will he only to correct a clear abuse of discretion. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex.1992)(orig.proceeding). Moreover, *770 there must be no other adequate remedy at law. Id. Based on the record before us, we are unable to conclude that Relators do not have an adequate remedy by appeal. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a). Our opinion should not be construed as a ruling on the merits of the choice of law issue presented in this mandamus proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice.

Relators, Celadon Trucking Services, Inc., Jesus Mesta, and Dolores Rosales, ask this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 120th District Court of El Paso County. Mandamus will he only to correct a clear abuse of discretion. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex.1992)(orig.proceeding). Moreover, *770 there must be no other adequate remedy at law. Id. Based on the record before us, we are unable to conclude that Relators do not have an adequate remedy by appeal. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a). Our opinion should not be construed as a ruling on the merits of the choice of law issue presented in this mandamus proceeding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 S.W.3d 769, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 2812, 2005 WL 850429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-celadon-trucking-services-inc-texapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack