in Re Cedric Nickerson A/K/A Cedric Webb
This text of in Re Cedric Nickerson A/K/A Cedric Webb (in Re Cedric Nickerson A/K/A Cedric Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-04-376-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
__________________________________________________________________
IN RE CEDRIC NICKERSON A/K/A CEDRIC WEBB
__________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Wittig
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relator, Cedric Nickerson A/K/A Cedric Webb, filed a petition for writ of mandamus, and a motion to file same, in the above cause on July 23, 2004. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought.
Accordingly, the motion and petition for writ of mandamus are DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 17th day of August, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Cedric Nickerson A/K/A Cedric Webb, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cedric-nickerson-aka-cedric-webb-texapp-2004.