in Re Cedric Christopher Edison

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 11, 2006·No. 01-06-00331-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued May 11, 2006




In The

Court of Appeals

For the

First District of Texas

____________


NO. 01-06-00331-CV

____________


IN RE CEDRIC CHRISTOPHER EDISON, Relator





Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus





MEMORANDUM OPINIONRelator , Cedric Christopher Edison, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the named relator, Charles A. Bacarisse, District Clerk of Harris County, to “perfect service/issue issuance of citation with petition.” This Court has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999) (orig. proceeding). The filing of a notice of appeal invokes this Court’s jurisdiction. See id. (citing Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App.1996), Rhem v. State, 820 S.W.2d 946, 947 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991) (published order)).

          We have no jurisdiction over relator’s trial-court cause. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Alcala.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Cedric Christopher Edison, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

in Re Cedric Christopher Edison (in Re Cedric Christopher Edison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rhem v. State
820 S.W.2d 946 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
In Re Washington
7 S.W.3d 181 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)