In re Cecil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Cecil

205 A.D.2d 876, 614 N.Y.S.2d 334

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 876 (In re Cecil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cecil, 205 A.D.2d 876, 614 N.Y.S.2d 334 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated February 22, 1993, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of one year, effective nunc pro tunc as of December 14, 1992 (see, Matter of Cecil, 190 AD2d 986). She now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of section 806.9 [22 NYCRR 806.9] of the Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose the application. Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and she is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By decision dated February 22, 1993, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of one year, effective nunc pro tunc as of December 14, 1992 (see, Matter of Cecil, 190 AD2d 986). She now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of section 806.9 [22 NYCRR 806.9] of the Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose the application. Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and she is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 876, 614 N.Y.S.2d 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cecil-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack