In Re CB Restaurants, Inc. D/B/A Sugars v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re CB Restaurants, Inc. D/B/A Sugars v. the State of Texas (In Re CB Restaurants, Inc. D/B/A Sugars v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-24-00725-CV
IN RE CB RESTAURANTS, INC. d/b/a Sugars, Relator
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2024
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On October 24, 2024, Relator, CB Restaurants, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus.
After considering the petition and record in this case, the court concludes Relator is not entitled to
the relief sought. Accordingly, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2023CI25937, styled Elizabeth Martinez and Julian Silva, Individually, as wrongful death beneficiaries, and on behalf of the Estate of Cary Silva, and Lindsay Shanahan, as next friend of J.S. and L.S., minor children v. CB Restaurants, Inc. d/b/a Sugars and Thirsty's Spot SA LLC d/b/a Thirsty's SA, pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re CB Restaurants, Inc. D/B/A Sugars v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cb-restaurants-inc-dba-sugars-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.