In re Cavuto

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Cavuto

645 A.2d 786, 137 N.J. 535, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 840

DecidedAugust 17, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 645 A.2d 786 (In re Cavuto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cavuto, 645 A.2d 786, 137 N.J. 535, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 840 (N.J. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Court seeking an order directing ANTHONY J. CAVUTO of MOUNT HOLLY to show cause why he should not be temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the conclusion of ethics proceedings against him, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTHONY J. CAVUTO show cause before this Court on September 12, 1994, at 2:00 p.m., Supreme Court courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, why he should not be temporarily suspended from practice and why the Office of Attorney Ethics should not take protective action, pursuant to Rule l:20-'ll(c), as may be appropriate to gain possession and control of respondent’s legal files, records, practice and trust assets; and it is further

ORDERED that a co-signatory for respondent’s attorney trust account be named forthwith, that co-signatory to be approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his designee, present this matter to the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Court seeking an order directing ANTHONY J. CAVUTO of MOUNT HOLLY to show cause why he should not be temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the conclusion of ethics proceedings against him, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTHONY J. CAVUTO show cause before this Court on September 12, 1994, at 2:00 p.m., Supreme Court courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, why he should not be temporarily suspended from practice and why the Office of Attorney Ethics should not take protective action, pursuant to Rule l:20-'ll(c), as may be appropriate to gain possession and control of respondent’s legal files, records, practice and trust assets; and it is further

ORDERED that a co-signatory for respondent’s attorney trust account be named forthwith, that co-signatory to be approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his designee, present this matter to the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

645 A.2d 786, 137 N.J. 535, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cavuto-nj-1994.