In Re Cavers

1944 OK CR 86, 154 P.2d 106, 79 Okla. Crim. 262, 1944 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 86
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 13, 1944
DocketNo. A-10575.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 1944 OK CR 86 (In Re Cavers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Cavers, 1944 OK CR 86, 154 P.2d 106, 79 Okla. Crim. 262, 1944 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 86 (Okla. Ct. App. 1944).

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus instituted by Walter Cavers, an inmate of tiie Oklahoma State Penitentiary.

The verified petition alleges facts surrounding the conviction of the defendant on November 12, 1931, of the crime of robbery, in the district court of Oklahoma county and his sentence to serve a term of 35 years imprisonment in the State Penitentiary.

After reciting many facts concerning the arrest and incarceration of the petitioner and the procedure followed in procuring his plea of guilty, the petition prays that this court commute the sentence of defendant from 35 years to 28 years’ imprisonment in the State Penitentiary. The Attorney General has filed a demurrer to the petition.

Under the provision of 22 O. S. 1941 § 1066, this court, in any case which is appealed, may reverse, affirm, or modify the judgment appealed from, or may order a new trial. If this had been an appeal instead of an original proceeding in habeas corpus, and the facts concerning the nature of the crime and the youthfulness of petitioner were as alleged in his petition, the court might have been inclined under the above statute to modify the judgment in the furtherance of justice.

After the conviction has become final, and no appeal has been lodged in this court, the Criminal Court of Appeals no longer has authority to modify any sentence assessed against an accused.

*264 The sole power to issue commutations after conviction is'vested in the Governor under the provision of article 6, sec. 10, Oklahoma Constitution.

Since the Criminal Court of Appeals is without authority to grant the relief sought in the petition, it follows that the petition for writ of habeas corpus should be and the same is hereby denied.

BAREFOOT, J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Ervin
1954 OK CR 16 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1954)
Ex Parte Moore
1948 OK CR 116 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1948)
Ex Parte Scharnhaus
1948 OK CR 105 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1948)
In Re Cavers
1945 OK CR 126 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1944 OK CR 86, 154 P.2d 106, 79 Okla. Crim. 262, 1944 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cavers-oklacrimapp-1944.