In re Cavaluzzi

241 A.D. 840

This text of 241 A.D. 840 (In re Cavaluzzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cavaluzzi, 241 A.D. 840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Order directing the town clerk of the town of North Hempstead to reconvene the board of canvassers of the Carle Place water district and directing said board to segregate certain ballots for submission to the court reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on authority of Matter [841]*841of Perry (post, p. 841), decided herewith. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Scudder, J., concurs with the following memorandum: While the respondent may not avail himself of the summary remedy laid down by the Election Law — and that is all he has asked — it seems to me that there is inherently in the Supreme Court the power to compel inspectors of election to perform a manifest duty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D. 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cavaluzzi-nyappdiv-1934.