In re Cavadel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Cavadel

901 A.2d 979

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 17, 2006

DocketNo. 1109 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 901 A.2d 979 (In re Cavadel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cavadel, 901 A.2d 979 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2006, Joel H. Cavadel having been suspended from the practice of law for a period of nine months before the Board of Immigration Review, the Immigration Courts and the Department of Homeland Security by Order of the Board of Immigration Review dated November 14, 2005; the said Joel H. Cavadel having been directed on February 7, 2006, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Joel H. Cavadel is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of nine months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2006, Joel H. Cavadel having been suspended from the practice of law for a period of nine months before the Board of Immigration Review, the Immigration Courts and the Department of Homeland Security by Order of the Board of Immigration Review dated November 14, 2005; the said Joel H. Cavadel having been directed on February 7, 2006, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Joel H. Cavadel is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of nine months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

901 A.2d 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cavadel-pa-2006.